Damus
ODELL · 5w
since bip110 has nowhere near consensus it will result in a chain split when they activate the main chain will have blocks mined significantly faster than the bip110 chain if miners switch to bip110...
Bond008 profile picture
This reeks of desperation.

Do you really not understand why it's good to fix exploits and loopholes that attract spammers? Or why its important for node runners to run code that aligns with their values?

You will find yourself outnumbered. It is so odd seeing you try to find a way right down the middle of this debate.

So many core supporters told the rest of us to fork off. Now it seems like some of the people on the core side are regretting saying that. Why are you so nervous?

Are people allowed to fork off or should we just do what you and your friends say?

34❤️14🤙2🎯1
ODELL · 5w
a hard fork would be a very clean safe way to handle this but bip110 is not that the goal is to reorg thousands of transactions if yall dont get your way and your dear leader is calling anyone with concerns a pedo so spare me the lecture on desperation
CitizenPedro · 5w
Yeah, I really don't see it like that. I think the decision of completely disallowing users to choose if they want or not to cap the OP_RETURN was not a good move by Core and Knots is better for allowing choice but: This, on the other hand, is something else. The risk argument is weak here. If and...
ihsotas · 5w
A hard fork would be forking off. This fake emergency bullshit smells so hard of fed it glows.
HODL Baek · 5w
The whole thing is too political now. Imma just stack sats. Another 5% discount today