They'll tey for sure.. nostr:nevent1qqsrt0zgn8f2s4k8g286s8fwuh3nmq2mk0pd09zmm4pvhl89s9q3huspzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtczyzyx00ke86yuj0gd3tyckfzrc4250x0dhyvsx355dvfwq0cnvez9qqcyqqqqqqgazhasq

I’m a pleb. Not a bot. Not a shill. Not a podcaster. Not a bitcoin influencer. Just an anon lurking pleb. To be clear, my perspective is not that self custody is over, but my perspective is, as just some guy who can’t and won’t audit self custody hardware + software, who and what can I trust...

Zero lies detected. Onward good lad!

nostr:nevent1qqs2hz2vpl7rer36g2jamxg00mt2dkrqdmxz4av3ra0lprlxc7xyahspz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7q3qg2pg7jdchq99d2l4gl0u75tn3n9jldmdej88qwu0fvgegu3gq69qxpqqqqqqzfht7q4

Assume bad faith from such people

and a note of accounts that are pushing you to lose sats on a fork that they themselves price as a shitfork nostr:nevent1qqsvwxur99dpn7euhuq0vrspkr3j7q3fpanlmemcfr7eguzavrs64qqpr9mhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet59upzpnk6hqd7gth50k77v5l5hfatykkr4gevls4kwthqlzwqltug9uf7qvzqqqqqqyu7lf3a

Couldn't agree more. Temporary issues with one hardware wallet don't invalidate the principle of self-custody. If anything, they remind us not to rely on a single vendor and to understand the tools we're using. The answer to a hardware wallet issue isn't to hand your keys back to a custodian.