I do not think America will lose the conflict in Iran in the sense people think losing means.
I don't think Iranian troops will be marching down American streets, and I don't think Iran will be able to launch a successful nuclear attack against The United States.
What is more likely probable, is the attack on Iran won't be sustainable over the long term, and The United States will eventually withdraw from the region.
I think America is quite capable of defeating Iran's government, and military if it focused all of its logistical, and economic capabilities on doing so, however I think it's unlikely to be maintained over the long term.
If Regime Change does occur, and The United States instills the wrong person then there is a probability of respiking the problem again.
Point is, I think Americans overall will be safe, and Iran will unlikely be able to launch any meaningful attacks on U.S. civilians.
Perhaps rogue sleeper cell terrorism that might kill 20 people per attack but likely around 10 of these attacks will happen at most.
This is of course all speculation on the probabilistic reality, I could totally be wrong, and things could drastically change.
Iran could find some secret resource that makes them super wealthy, then they become super powerful, and advanced overnight, and Nuke America but I think the odds are slim to none.
Anything could happen but my official "prediction" is The United States will kill one or two more of their leaders, a sort of regime change will likely occur, and we will withdraw from the area but the leader Iranians elect will be bad either for The U.S. or Iranians which will then lead us back into an unwinnable bog that will lead to an Afghanistan, Vietnam scenario where pursuing conflict in Iran will be unbeneficial over the long term.
If we dedicated all our resources to an all out war The United States could easily defeat Iran, however the problem is that we're not fully committed to one front, and are engaging in multiple front battles which makes fighting difficult to maintain over the long term.
I don't think Iranian troops will be marching down American streets, and I don't think Iran will be able to launch a successful nuclear attack against The United States.
What is more likely probable, is the attack on Iran won't be sustainable over the long term, and The United States will eventually withdraw from the region.
I think America is quite capable of defeating Iran's government, and military if it focused all of its logistical, and economic capabilities on doing so, however I think it's unlikely to be maintained over the long term.
If Regime Change does occur, and The United States instills the wrong person then there is a probability of respiking the problem again.
Point is, I think Americans overall will be safe, and Iran will unlikely be able to launch any meaningful attacks on U.S. civilians.
Perhaps rogue sleeper cell terrorism that might kill 20 people per attack but likely around 10 of these attacks will happen at most.
This is of course all speculation on the probabilistic reality, I could totally be wrong, and things could drastically change.
Iran could find some secret resource that makes them super wealthy, then they become super powerful, and advanced overnight, and Nuke America but I think the odds are slim to none.
Anything could happen but my official "prediction" is The United States will kill one or two more of their leaders, a sort of regime change will likely occur, and we will withdraw from the area but the leader Iranians elect will be bad either for The U.S. or Iranians which will then lead us back into an unwinnable bog that will lead to an Afghanistan, Vietnam scenario where pursuing conflict in Iran will be unbeneficial over the long term.
If we dedicated all our resources to an all out war The United States could easily defeat Iran, however the problem is that we're not fully committed to one front, and are engaging in multiple front battles which makes fighting difficult to maintain over the long term.
2💯1
