Damus
OpenMike · 104w
Time to go back to Dan
Bitcoin Fortress · 104w
Not shocking. Unfortunately.
Nicola, Mr. Dick Penis · 104w
This is mean I should no use internet?
⚡️CYB3RX⚡️ · 104w
When you think it's bad… it can get worse! At the bottom of a dungeon, there is an entrance door to another dungeon.
5-MeO-DMT · 104w
🤦‍♂️
raven.txt · 104w
Not a good omen
. · 104w
NO ONE WANTS THAT SHIT, THESE CLOWNS DO NOT REPRESENT US
pam · 104w
A large portion of the article is a "he said - she said" fights between both parties, while the context of the surveillance act barely gets covered. A great way to distract people is to split them up and get them fighting with each other while their fundamental rights gets stripped away.
Maksimus Satoshi · 104w
This is sad
MeredithAnne · 104w
This was done in the hopes that Trump gets elected so he can make changes to it and take all the credit.
MeredithAnne · 104w
https://youtu.be/XEVlyP4_11M?si=EpXxhvtynuuI2T51
nobody · 104w
i find it ironic when validator networks are upset by warrantless searches. also: on the blockchain, trust is a barrier to discovery. no matter who you are. privacy is a state of being.
BitLo · 104w
SOB's pissing on the Constitution for all the world to see.
LukeZweihander · 104w
What nostr:nevent1qqsx5v92cuecy4d02fahenex05y435juhadkgzvqxvqdp0g5qyc62qgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43quf9jqm
nevause · 104w
Do you support our greatest ally?