average_gary on nostr

looks like there was a USB vuln between 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 that would be referenced to. given USB as the threat vector, an air gapped setup would not be affected. I don't believe he is complicit based on a number of things but this needed some clarification

JackTheMimic · 1d

I don't know, if I would call it complicity, just that he wouldn't understand the repercussions of why his guide would be important. It would however be foreknowledge.

. · 1d

This is my reasoning: If because of what Novak said to Matt about unreleased 4.0.0 resulted in (A) Matt knew being below 4.0.0 was not vulnerable + (B) Matt knew his guide was not vulnerable ie dice rolls + (C) Matt says he can't say why and to not dissect why Then (D) Are we to believe he never ...