Damus
Cyph3rp9nk profile picture
Cyph3rp9nk
@Cyph3rp9nk
Let's give objective facts.

- Currently there is no consensus in Bitcoin, everyone updates the latest version of core, where is the consensus? What do you mean by consensus?
- There are more implementations than Core.
- It is true that applying a filter to mitigate spam affects the ability to calculate the rates of your mempool if others do not apply this filter, but to criticize this is not to understand the consensus.
- Consensus is nothing more than a majority applying the same rule, let people do what they want and let there be consensus, which currently does not exist.
- To criticize Knots because it only has one developer is suspicious to say the least.

Bitcoin Core developers are not saints, it has already been demonstrated with taproot, those who promoted taproot were associated at the time with mining pools, who has taproot benefited?

We need alternatives to Core more than ever, if you don't like it, stick your finger up your ass.

I find this campaign against Knots and filters by some very suspicious.
82❤️7💯2🔥1
BitcoinLoveLife · 49w
💯👍👍
𝕞ptf · 49w
Regardless of the arguments, to openly criticise another implementation which gives more diversification is very suspect
FernandoTheKoala · 49w
As someone who is fairly new to btc, how did we end up with “core centralization” of 98% ? I mean, it was obviously a critical point of failure, so why in these 16 years has there not been more alternatives to core?