There are anarcho-capitalist authors who defend open borders because they say that freedom of movement cannot be restricted.

There are other anarcho-capitalist authors who do not defend open borders because they claim that a country’s borders belong to the individuals of that country and therefore are private property, and it is the inhabitants of a country who decide whom they allow to enter and whom they do not.

Personally, I do not believe in open borders.

So what is anarcho-capitalism? No one can assert what anarcho-capitalism is; anarcho-capitalism, like any other ideology, can be defined as the common denominators of all its authors.

Economically, it is the doctrine that comes closest to my way of thinking, but it has failed in many aspects, such as trying to solve the problem through politics, and this is contradictory; here agorism prevails.

Morally, anarcho-capitalism offers nothing; it is empty (with the exception of the attack on the state, this is always moral and correct).

There is nothing wrong with pointing this out; the world is not perfect, nor will it be.