Damus
stefan (stefbun) · 3d
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q sure is ey. But thats for mastos lawyers to figure. But tbh I dunno if they even ask...
SuperDicq profile picture
@stefan (stefbun) There's no need to ask lawyers, this is a well established practice.

Every source file should have a license header.

And other files such as images should have their license clarified somewhere in the repo. Either in the readme, or a separate txt file containing image attributions, or just putting something like a image.png.txt file next to the image with the license in it. Anything works as long as it is clear which image has which license.
1
stefan (stefbun) · 3d
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q I meant masto asking lawyers with their trademark policy btw...