Way to miss the point. his violation of moral and legal ethics lead to Bitcoiners who followed every rule and guideline he gave them losing 100 million dollars. Removing his ability to do it again is ...
This ColdCard disaster is horrifying on so many levels and you're trying to leverage that as emotional weight behind your crusade.
It's absurd to hold him 100% responsible for the loss of funds - in part because there were others promoting CC, in part because people who followed his full guidelines (for years) rolled their own dice, and mostly because you're not considering at all the benefit of having him - and others - pushing relentless for self-custody.
It's absurd to hold him 100% responsible for the loss of funds - in part because there were others promoting CC, in part because people who followed his full guidelines (for years) rolled their own dice, and mostly because you're not considering at all the benefit of having him - and others - pushing relentless for self-custody.
2
