Damus
nostrich · 8w
freeze = confiscate = steal, aren’t you worried about the precedent this sets? whatever the argument you might make in its favor, it defeats bitcoin’s whole purpose
Matt Corallo profile picture
Does it? First of all you didn’t engage with the argument in the post at all, so I’d encourage you to do so. But to your point, I disagree. You could also see this as preventing these coins from being stolen. In fact, in order to enable people to claim funds that were stored insecurely but using a seedphrase-based derivation you *have* to freeze insecure spend paths. Given that is the vast majority of wallets today, I find it hard to believe the tradeoff of screwing most bitcoiners is worth it.
monsieurenchilada · 8w
"Preventing these coins from being stolen" sounds a lot like taking away agency from the coin owners, active intervention, even if with good intentions is what the fiat system constantly does. Giving people the tools to move them to a safe address seems way more sane to me, if they don't take acti...