Damus
m4dire0701 · 1w
Both capitalism and socialism are ambiguous terms
m4dire0701 profile picture
The terms capitalism and socialism are worn out relics of nineteenth century ideology. Both depend on centralization and political management.

Capitalism, as it exists today, is not voluntary free exchange but a State protected hierarchy of corporate privileges, central banking, and legal monopolies.
Socialism, in turn, replaces one master with another, trading the capitalist for the commissar, the market for the Ministry.

Both are forms of centralized economics, where power flows downward and freedom upward only by permission.

Neo-Agorism belongs to neither camp. It represents decentralized economics, an order of voluntary, bottom up cooperation. Not capitalism in the corporatist sense, not socialism in the collectivist sense, but a stateless market rooted in mutual exchange.

The proper language of freedom is not “isms” but markets, real, living, spontaneous markets between free individuals.

https://philippelemieux.com/2025/11/11/neo-agorism-is-neither-capitalist-nor-socialist/
23❤️1:48:1❤️1👍1
ChadXMR · 1w
To me Capitalism = free markets and private property Socialism = centrally planned economy and common property Todays western systems would in this regard best be described as "corporatism" where state and corporations are intertwined in governing
Vikingarna1990 · 1w
Capitalism has never materialized on planet Earth, so I do not see a reason why this designation should be used. Capitalism requires that the people have property rights, which they do not have, so capitalism does not exist today. The same applies to liberalism and democracy. Corporations, busi...
Primal Protocol · 1w
Decentralization is key, just like our ancestral diet, where we hunted and gathered, no central control needed.