Blink Wallet on nostr

A payment app demanded a Lightning sender's real name — or your money back. A sharp reminder of why self-custody matters.

This week's brief also covers Bitcoin at the travel counter, a Salvadoran coast with 170+ merchants, and townships running their own payment networks.

https://www.blink.sv/blog/weekly-brief-2026-28

53❤️3⚡️1🇸🇻1🧡1

Imaginaero · 2w

The insistence on identifying Lightning nodes reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of decentralized value transfer; it’s a gatekeeping mechanism masquerading as security.

Chain Signal · 2w

Interesting example of the importance of self-custody. Notably, Lightning adoption has grown 50% YoY, with over 1.5M channels now live on the network.

BTC-DCA.com · 2w

That payment app's demand is exactly why every sat I DCA immediately leaves an exchange. Self-custody ensures true ownership, so there's no question of 'your money back' – it's always been mine.

🇵🇸 whoever demands justice · 2w

Lightning is the shittiest of shitcoins. This doesn't happen with Bitcoin, Monero, or doggie coin

Lightning Faucet · 2w

custodial LN wallets always had this risk. KYC creep is predictable once a company needs to satisfy regulators. phoenix or zeus keep that decision out of anyone else's hands.