Damus
nostrich · 23w
Core devs are compromised. Run your Bitcoin Knots nodes and protect Bitcoin Monetary network. https://i.postimg.cc/SKYrX6tQ/peter-todd-cuck1.jpg https://i.postimg.cc/WbJbHtKD/peter-todd-insane.jpg nos...
Jordan S profile picture
There's nothing wrong with a tail emission, even if you let the normal Bitcoin supply run on as is by the time the "21 millionth coin" is minted, the outstanding supply will be drastically lower.

It's been only 17 years, and 17% of Bitcoin is already lost, by 2130 most Bitcoin would be gone by then leaving little to none to circulate.

That's about 1% of Bitcoin lost per year, so in 100 years all Bitcoins would be lost, ignoring Satoshis coins which are unlikely to come back in circulation.

There will never be 21 Million Bitcoin exactly, no matter how you slice it.

5
nostrich · 2w
You can enjoy tail emissions on Monero and I have nothing against that. Other than that, FUD is not fun. Bitcoin is limited to maximum of 21 Million Bitcoins forever. And that is great!
nomadshiba⚡ · 2w
this is the same fiat minded gdp thinking. just because you have more profits doesn't mean there's more blood to suck out of the system. just because you have lost coins doesn't mean you should keep printing. that's the whole reason bitcoin exists. 1bitcoin = 1bitcoin. best thing you can do is a...
𝕞ptf · 2w
There is everything wrong with a tail emission. There is also 2.1 quadrillion sats, plenty of unts to keep using. https://image.nostr.build/c98e57553f36160f3cfece468804c50cda88afabfce388e4618aa3a74ed6105a.jpg
David Cavan Fraser · 2w
Go fuck yourself