nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqxp9e8z64dx9csyyukngat49tqa07f0t868uxnsqhfp0sdsq4mwasmrr365 Hugh's claim is supported by his preexisting experience fucking Pragmatas. They are ve...
@nprofile1q... then the argument should be as follows:
>robots are intentionally designed.
>if something on a robot was designed to have something, it was then intended.
>loli bits have 1 purpose (sex).
>pragmatas are robots.
pragmatas have loli bits.
>pragmatas have loli bits intentionally.
ERGO: the pragmata robots have loli bits for the explicit purpose of letting you fuck them
>the intention behind a robot is it's purpose
>ergo: it is her purpose, actually
>robots are intentionally designed.
>if something on a robot was designed to have something, it was then intended.
>loli bits have 1 purpose (sex).
>pragmatas are robots.
pragmatas have loli bits.
>pragmatas have loli bits intentionally.
ERGO: the pragmata robots have loli bits for the explicit purpose of letting you fuck them
>the intention behind a robot is it's purpose
>ergo: it is her purpose, actually
2