Damus
Gzuuus · 10w
Probably the most of them, just keep nip 1 and then have a different specification layer for nostr app proposals, which almost all nips are in reality. They could be nips and naps. cc nostr:nprofile1qqswwud0pvzu362lehm0av6sq4zd97cue5uy0z8f7jgtk0hz368dvmcdvgw67
il_lost_ · 10w
no one
sandwich · 10w
all of them except NIP-01
TheGrinder · 10w
I asked GPT that question and the list is LONG ๐Ÿ˜† https://chatgpt.com/share/69c270c7-22d4-800e-8f2b-9f7026545f06
Nuts · 10w
nip17 is terrible
Leo Wandersleb · 10w
Don't give so much weight to nips. They are there for those who need them. If you don't like a nip, leave it be. Not every client has to implement every nip and some are conflicting but those who want to support one way of doing things can use a nip to explain themselves. That's all these nips are. ...
So Tachi · 10w
just nuke the "official repo", this has nothing to do with nostr ๐Ÿ˜‚
Ingwie Phoenix (aka. birb) · 10w
- Unify all the coinage into a single one. It's cringe having so many NIPs just for that. - Figure out messaging. Like, for fucking real. xD (Working on doing my part.) - Actually nuke markets. I see nobody using them. - Torrents and Files should be unified - use source attribution instead (blossom ...
Diacone Frost · 10w
we could also nuke the official repo ๐Ÿค”