Damus
Dave · 2d
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqkf7a2q5ma5myv2hmrvgfdu4waqv33xxecsp57m68xwuqgl4qxj8s72zpdn nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqdf6eyr7x6cv4gq99h3rjnhj6f4yqzxa...
Dave profile picture
@nprofile1q... @nprofile1q... The point I was trying to make is that these systems are designed to give "an answer". If the question is of the type "how tall is the Eiffel tower", we can judge cleanly if the answer is correct. It's falsifiable.

If the question is of the type "why did the Roman empire fall", the answer *must* be partially wrong, no matter what it is, because that isn't a question which has "an answer". That is a "reality reference" class of question.
1
Dave · 2d
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqkf7a2q5ma5myv2hmrvgfdu4waqv33xxecsp57m68xwuqgl4qxj8s72zpdn nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqdf6eyr7x6cv4gq99h3rjnhj6f4yqzxa97pxf2ecxeq82ea8mwdyqrp7epg No line of reasoning or logical syllogism gets you to *an answer* as to ...