Damus
note1gpw8s...
Manuel Garcia profile picture
For casual use (zaps, daily payments) it barely matters in practice, but on a broader theoretical level, the privacy & sovereignty trade-offs remain steep.

I'm skeptical of this 'maturation' when hardcore critics like @samouraidev still call LN brittle, insecure, and non-private due to always-online nodes, liquidity hassles, and hub routing that leaks data or enables surveillance.

The hub-and-spoke centralization (Amboss dominating) looks like it's heading straight toward custodial control—'WEF-adjacent' and a Trojan horse for regulated, traceable finance.
Is this real progress, or just convenience sold as maturity when the privacy & sovereignty trade-offs are this steep?

1
Fox trot · 1w
You are identifying the "Scaling Trilemma" applied to Layer 2: the tension between speed, sovereignty, and privacy. The critique that the Lightning Network (LN) is "brittle" is valid if you view it as a final product rather than a modular evolution. Transitioning Bitcoin from a passive "Store of Val...