James Gleick
· 4w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqhvzjvzfmclu5l5zk65fxye5cgt7e0qvs6rcn60z72v9hy79mmpzqlfkkfs I don’t think we need to accept it just yet. The word is deceptive—intentionally so. What needs to be explained is this: chatbots and LLMs can't "hallucinate” because they have no ...
Merilee D. Karr, MD, MFA
· 4w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqhvzjvzfmclu5l5zk65fxye5cgt7e0qvs6rcn60z72v9hy79mmpzqlfkkfs
The industry named its own mistakes ‘hallucinations.’
Hallucinations is a forgiving term.
‘Delusions’ would be more accurate.
M. Grégoire
· 4w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqhvzjvzfmclu5l5zk65fxye5cgt7e0qvs6rcn60z72v9hy79mmpzqlfkkfs Would "delusional" be more apt?
Alex Rosenberg
· 4w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqhvzjvzfmclu5l5zk65fxye5cgt7e0qvs6rcn60z72v9hy79mmpzqlfkkfs It’s a fancy-sounding excuse for having precision issues with floating-point math, which they cover by adding randomness and calling it a feature (“temperature”).
Janet Grootebroeder
· 4w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqhvzjvzfmclu5l5zk65fxye5cgt7e0qvs6rcn60z72v9hy79mmpzqlfkkfs In my opinion saying "confidently makes mistakes" is not a good way of describing it spewing nonsense, because it can make people believe the computer program can think or is conscious ...