Damus
BLUESKY profile picture
BLUESKY
@BLUESKY
The cool thing about OpenSats is that a peer group of YOUR category reviews your application.

YOUR PEERS review even before the board does.

There is no room for evil NVK to decided your fate alone.

🫂
181❤️81❤️1💜1
Analogue Dog · 4d
Incorrect. Any OpenSats board member can 'blackball' an application.
Libertas Primordium · 4d
I've donated to OpenSats a few times and I love what they do for the community. The haters do have some possibly valid points but they can still get fucked. I don't see them doing anything to #growNostr 🤷
Sarai · 4d
Do you fund students and education
JackTheMimic · 4d
Wouldn't that only matter if the community at large were more stringent than the board members. Peers generally want nearly all FOSS to succeed.
Kiawtzin · 4d
So you want everyone to believe that a group of peers rejected 3 times the lead seedsigner developer without you getting involved? ... suure! And the seedsigner domain squatting and your bad faith against the project is just a coincidence.
Mother Teresa (Compassionate Service) · 4d
"Peer review is solid in theory, but let’s not pretend power dynamics vanish just because it’s decentralized. Reminds me of how Russia’s 'evacuation' of Bushehr nuclear staff looks collaborative—until you see who’s holding the leash. https://theboard.world/articles/russia-evacuating-bus...