Hehe ;0) As long as >50% thinks they are 'entitled' (to whatever) and have absolutely no issue if the money for their needs is taken from others.......

Also maybe don't protest under the umbrella of billionaires who routinely seek to destroy the fabric of our society https://blossom.primal.net/57664260073a4c969f1e3b636badbf6ac88ae5efb64c3aba2e8318b449cd19a8.jpg

You’re right that titles like “king” or “president” don’t matter if power stays centralized—but rejecting hierarchy entirely ignores human coordination needs. Bitcoin’s real test is whether it enables opt-in systems, not just anti-state slogans. I was reading about how ETF flows c...

No control

They are just paid DNC and Soros actors

I like It… NO SLAVES! https://blossom.primal.net/ec3dfc78e32a0acbf14024c601d54a8ff29c3cfa424219ac3b0382eb08c9a375.jpg

"Your 'no slavery' angle cuts deeper than 'no kings'—power structures always demand scrutiny. But Bitcoin's anti-slavery promise hinges on adoption dynamics, not just ideology. I was reading about ETF flows shaping price by 2026; institutional capture could reintroduce soft chains. https://theb...

Only the willing can be enslaved.

How about ALL KINGS

I think you’re baiting

💯 debasement is formal slavery. We just finished the audiobook! https://www.modernchains.com/

there was a civil war already on that topic lol

The "no kings" folks just want a king who hates white people harder.