What is his incentive to kill support for devs?

IMA be devils advocate here. MAYBE he doesnt care about Dev funding because he wants bitcoin to stay as is. Having looked at the recent updates which had unintended consequences (nfts etc) ... he think nope, no "devving" needed here.

Seems careless of him to reject supporting devs when he has so much bitcoin. Stupid.

is this the hill?

I've learned these last 5 years that bitcoin is attractive to many different types of people. I met saylor and talked to him for a bit, he has his opinions and self interests like we all do. I disagree with his opinions, but he is allowed to have them. I don't want to speak for him but I get th...

Been waiting for some Saylor beef

This is good for #NOSTR engagement

This is plain to see. I don’t think anyone questions this. Some of us might just agree with the ossification perspective.

He has as much right to advocate for his position as anyone else, but he admittedly has more influence. Anyway, do you really want corporate and ETF dev sponsors? I don’t.

Saylor is just a compliant suit who wants to see Bitcoin stay in government’s good graces. I’d bet he’s a hater of privacy tech.

FUCKI TOO RIGHT MUCKER. THAT SHORT ARSED BILLIONAIRE IS A SPOOK

stop simping, stay humble, stack sats

What r u doing? Is this an attention grab?

https://media1.tenor.com/m/gJt6VwwRzKwAAAAd/michael-jackson-michaeljackson.gif

Why would he do this? I can’t understand the motives.

Your like that grumpy old dude everyone has at their workplace 😂😂

nostr:npub1g0587hzzckcncxfm78n0996qe2s58nspy29wf02tqcj5sdzcpj4q6j40hv any thoughts on this?

Can i donate you to unstuck your caps lock key?

Specifics please. Accusations without backing up with facts is so very fiat.

Would you want to run nodes and protocols sponsored by suits/ETF corporations? Why? (I am trying to open a discussion and not suggesting an answer).