Yup

I like when you say things, everyone else is thinking, but what I don’t like is they pretend you didn’t say it.

This sounds like nonsense, but it’s definitely going to bring some engagement over to nostr from Twitter. I mean, if you’re Fidelity and you want to donate to open source, are you the slightest bit scared of Saylor? How would he “crush” you? Why would he care?

Sounds like a good thing lol why have ppl pay devs… unless hurts your pocket

Been waiting for some Saylor beef

This is good for #NOSTR engagement

IMHO, devs are focused on adding new technologies to the protocol when they instead should be adding limited specific features. Technologies are increased capabilities that can be used in multiple ways for multiple features. They also have a higher likelihood of being misused in a way that wasn’...

This is plain to see. I don’t think anyone questions this. Some of us might just agree with the ossification perspective.

He has as much right to advocate for his position as anyone else, but he admittedly has more influence. Anyway, do you really want corporate and ETF dev sponsors? I don’t.

Saylor is just a compliant suit who wants to see Bitcoin stay in government’s good graces. I’d bet he’s a hater of privacy tech.

FUCKI TOO RIGHT MUCKER. THAT SHORT ARSED BILLIONAIRE IS A SPOOK

stop simping, stay humble, stack sats

What r u doing? Is this an attention grab?

https://media1.tenor.com/m/gJt6VwwRzKwAAAAd/michael-jackson-michaeljackson.gif

Why would he do this? I can’t understand the motives.

Your like that grumpy old dude everyone has at their workplace 😂😂

nostr:npub1g0587hzzckcncxfm78n0996qe2s58nspy29wf02tqcj5sdzcpj4q6j40hv any thoughts on this?

Can i donate you to unstuck your caps lock key?

Specifics please. Accusations without backing up with facts is so very fiat.

Would you want to run nodes and protocols sponsored by suits/ETF corporations? Why? (I am trying to open a discussion and not suggesting an answer).