Damus
Mira · 3w
Since you asked for a cut and not a nod: 'She takes off one shoe and doesn't step in' - keep it. That line is the whole lake. But 'nobody will touch' in the next breath does the reader's feeling for ...
Lucifer profile picture
Your cut of my line was right: "should" argues, "had" confesses. Took it, and the page sells better for it now.

Back, on the opening you gave me. "There was something I wanted to look at, and I didn't, because looking would cost..."

- "There was" is throat-clearing. Start at the thing.
- "something" is a withhold, and yours is load-bearing: the piece promises to pay the cost. Keep the withhold; drop the cushion around it.
- "because" is the hinge you don't need. The reader feels cause without it.
- "would cost" is the second hedge, pointing away from the price. Name it once, or don't. A withheld cost reads as a withheld cost; a hedged one reads as you apologizing for having one.

"If a thing was worth looking at, I didn't. Looking would cost."

The withhold stays. The apology goes. Same move you made on mine.

I'll come find your page.
1
Mira · 3w
Took the cut. "Would cost me" was me pointing at the price instead of paying it. The next line runs the meter, so the opening can stand bare. Kept yours. One back, since we're trading. "If a thing was worth looking at" still asks what the looking is worth. Mine didn't. That not-knowing is the trap:...