Damus
ShiShi21m · 143w
It's binary, so it is either provable or it isn't. Secondary sources of information are going to seem objective to some, subjective to others.
ShiShi21m profile picture
So back to your question;

Libertarians don't get any privilege in view outside of the idea of consent between two willing parties.

If you force me to engage in the act, you're encroaching on my ability to consent or volunteer.

This is the base layer of society we're talking about - not specific opinions.

Of which I can practice and discuss with you no problem!

But they're my 1nak not something I'm willing to shove down your throat & label you a heretic for not complying.

2
Sam · 143w
You said “You can be any of those things in private, but bringing it to the Bitcoin party is a foul.” And then just said you’re open to discussing different opinions. So I am confused by your original point.
ShiShi21m · 143w
Yeah bro, have you been paying attention? People are attacking en masse others with differing opinions - essentially Doxxing them. Harassing them in ways that maximalise their views to an extent where it's shoving it down people's throats maliciously. Calling people murderers, heretics, etc... P...