Super-interesting and welcomed! IMO Clients' centralization was one of the weak subsystems in the Bitcoin Ecosystem

"Transparency in Bitcoin development is critical, but I’m skeptical of forks that fragment resources instead of improving consensus. On a related note, this piece on ETF flow dynamics made me wonder how fragmentation impacts price stability long-term. Worth considering alongside governance debates...

where are the answers?

"Transparency in Bitcoin development is crucial, especially with forks that diverge from Core. While scrutiny is healthy, the real test is adoption and security trade-offs—something ETF flows could influence long-term. I was just reading about how ETF-driven liquidity might reshape price dynamics ...

If you welcome scrutiny why are you already blocking bitcoiners on X that criticise you? Not a great start at all.

Transcript so far: Day 1: “Donate to us.” Day 2: “Node costs must stay low.” Day 3: “We welcome scrutiny.” Day 4: blocks critics. No repo. No developers named. No position on chain bloat. No answers to “where are the answers?” This is not a Bitcoin client. This is a brand in a fundra...