Damus
Open in Damus
Rob Hamilton · 19w
"Futures markets are fiat and not what bitcoiners do" For those of you newer to Bitcoin, the last time there was a contentious fork, a futures market in 2017 was put up by Bitfinex. nostr:nprofile1q...
 Rob Hamilton profile picture
Rob Hamilton @Rob1Ham
Important to call out Dathon Ohm is now lying (misleading?) the consensus process by removing the rejected langauge about a reactive activation method, but may have to employ it anyway?

It'll get circulated once the new proposal comes out, deceit is not how you build rough consensus.



Dathon Ohm · 19w
After much discussion and consideration, I have decided to remove the reactive deployment method and the legal/moral motivations from the BIP document. I still think those things are important and the reactive deployment may become necessary in an emergency, but I want to contin Show more
4❤️1
Aaron van Wirdum · 19w
FWIW: https://image.nostr.build/1325bb48593f42388773f7a2049253ed3413e9246ca4a68b891f09db2ae73c2e.jpg
JackTheMimic · 19w
You literally don't understand the proposal so, I wouldn't bet you could parse whether it could be reactive if not specifically deployed as such. RTFM, thanks.
nonymous · 19w
Don’t panic. He is building consensus and it is a very good thing to remove that activation method as it was rejected by most users. If Luke wants the reactive way he can make his own fork proposal to do it. Indeed I think it is a good idea to separate both. I would support one and reject the othe...