A fork, splitting the chain without consensus, is an attack on Bitcoin. As it stands, this has no chance of gaining consensus and relies on a retarded game theory, which assumes the minority will be able to force everyone else against their will. Consensus, or they can fork off

A fork, splitting the chain without consensus, is an attack on Bitcoin. As it stands, this has no chance of gaining consensus and relies on a retarded game theory, which assumes the minority will be able to force everyone else against their will. Consensus, or they can fork off

It's a threat and attack to people making money with runes and inscriptions, etc

Obituary to your reputation and integrity, Odell.. https://youtu.be/5_aOb0Mru28

since bip110 has nowhere near consensus it will result in a chain split when they activate the main chain will have blocks mined significantly faster than the bip110 chain if miners switch to bip110 days, weeks, months after activation it will reverse every bitcoin transaction that happened on the...

Bip 110 would have the effect of putting spam into the UTXO set, harming node decentralisation, and the strict relay policy of Knots would centralise mining by encouraging miners to use out-of-band systems. It's an attack on all the important aspects of decentralisation, including Luke's desperate a...

Bitcoin either maintains censorship resistance, or it doesn’t. You cannot be a little bit pregnant. Bitcoin cannot be a little bit neutral. It is our money, AND the money of our adversaries. BIP110 is stupid. Its supporters are very stupid, and they are “here to fix spam.” Think about how b...

This summarizes it well https://blog.lopp.net/a-laymans-guide-to-bip-110/