Damus
⚡️Eric⚡️ · 162w
How influential!
The Daniel 🖖 · 162w
We use it specifically for the fact that it doesn’t.
⚡️🌱🌙 · 162w
🤔 Meanwhile the most active person on nostr founded Twitter, and implemented worlds first engagement algos at scale.
alanajoy · 162w
Did you catch my post from a bitcoiner on twatter who said nostr is leftist drivel? Ranks amongst my favorite nostr fud to date lol
bu5hm4nn · 162w
Nothing wrong with algo’s as long as you know you’re using an algo. I would welcome personalizeable filtered views, for example “show me the most zapped posts of the last 6 hours”
signal_and_rage · 162w
https://media.tenor.com/AkIJa2fqzhQAAAAC/dune-salute.gif
RAM02 · 162w
fate loves irony
nobody · 162w
Why follow the rat race?
phil · 162w
I think quality content will get visibility without algos as people will follow those creating that content, engage with it and will repost it. The nostrich community is the algo.
cait 🧡⚡️🔮 · 162w
that sounds like a challenge 😏
Evan · 162w
Could someone technically build a client capable of an engagement algos ? Maybe even running locally with each user having control over the algo knobs and switches
jgbtc · 162w
How many of those are bots?
fp · 162w
Weird. Central Bankers think bitcoin is a fad. It’s like those that benefit from the current system can’t imagine anything supplanting it
Negation · 162w
Incentive > algo triggered engagement
Andrew · 162w
This would be up to relays, correct?
bitcoinbaba · 162w
🤡
Dave🐸 · 161w
lolz
jamw · 161w
https://media.tenor.com/sg0-acCPmdsAAAAC/bullshit-lies.gif