Most people just want less nonsense. Confused by DNS privacy tools? Which one is better, NextDNS or Control D?
https://untraceabledigitaldissident.com/nextdns-vs-control-d/
I wish you'd focus on more important privacy measures than DNS, which is am uphill battle of badness enumeration if your software and hardware can't be trusted.
Instead of following your guides on turning off iPhone permissions and configuring a pihole, your readers would have much better privacy but just using GrapheneOS which uses DoT by default and doesn't send any telemetry by default. DNS filtering can do nothing to stop Apple's telemetry if they just bundle it into a domain that's required for basic device function (they do).
Network obfuscation and DNS filtering is much more powerful through a VPN tunnel anyway since your ISP still sees domain names in plaintext with HTTPS even with a local DNS resolver. Installing Mullvad and using an ad and tracker blocking DNS filter will go way farther at obfuscating traffic than even the most aggressive local DNS filter without a VPN.
I love the content generally, my criticism is purely constructive and of good faith.
Instead of following your guides on turning off iPhone permissions and configuring a pihole, your readers would have much better privacy but just using GrapheneOS which uses DoT by default and doesn't send any telemetry by default. DNS filtering can do nothing to stop Apple's telemetry if they just bundle it into a domain that's required for basic device function (they do).
Network obfuscation and DNS filtering is much more powerful through a VPN tunnel anyway since your ISP still sees domain names in plaintext with HTTPS even with a local DNS resolver. Installing Mullvad and using an ad and tracker blocking DNS filter will go way farther at obfuscating traffic than even the most aggressive local DNS filter without a VPN.
I love the content generally, my criticism is purely constructive and of good faith.
1