You know what would be REALLY bad for Bitcoin?
If everyone blindly trusted a centralized dev team, bent to appeals to authority and willfully ignored gigantic red flags.
If no one defended Bitcoin...
I made this chart on why BIP110 is anti-bitcoin. "Spam" was never the debate
The rest of us care about scaling bitcoin, and we are very successful at ensuring that the UTXO set is kept small, and ensuring big miners don't benefit from out-of-band systems
Knots/BIP110 is an attack on Bitcoin. But it's also now a boring distraction, and therefore we'll see more blocks signal for BIP54-Consensus-Cleanup than we do for BIP-110
satsandsports.github.io/BIP110/
The rest of us care about scaling bitcoin, and we are very successful at ensuring that the UTXO set is kept small, and ensuring big miners don't benefit from out-of-band systems
Knots/BIP110 is an attack on Bitcoin. But it's also now a boring distraction, and therefore we'll see more blocks signal for BIP54-Consensus-Cleanup than we do for BIP-110
satsandsports.github.io/BIP110/
1
