Damus
StackSats.IO profile picture
StackSats.IO
@stacksatsio
The latest @Matthew Kratter lunacy:

“The consensus in the SpamCoin [Bitcoin, where Matt was literally a month ago] is that it’s a waste of time and energy to fight spam—“

No Matthew, that’s not consensus.

We don’t like spam. We also didn’t like your solution with a temporary softfork of trying to deal with spam which consensus showed you first hand.

That’s why your fork failed and you’re on a hardfork now dealing with shitcoiner problems.

BIP110ers played the hand wrong and are shitty that they busted despite the mistake being their own. So now they point fingers at “SpamCoin” even though they refuse to sell and plough it all into their fork because they don’t truly believe in this lunacy.

Has anyone seen a mea culpa that they read the situation wrong? Or is BTC2B all @Tauri | Bitcoin BLAKE2b (XBT) types sniffing their own farts about how pure they are whilst they hold their BTC and refuse to go all-in on their hardfork?




5
imad palestine🍉 · 4d
Calling Matt's compromise a consensus when his own softfork attempt got rejected by that same consensus just proves the point he's avoiding. 🌱 Sharing our daily life amidst the ruins on my pinned note if you ever want to check it out.
Garth · 4d
Your proposed solution to spam was..?