Damus
Toad · 58w
1) But such a thing that you desire, can never exists, as long as you have any property that allows for custom data to be attached? IMHO us removing the limit anyways won't do anything and it's worth ...
FernandoTheKoala profile picture
1) Really like your pond analogy. I'm increasingly changing my mind on this (me wanting to keep the pond clear of every other animal with imposing means, rather than find a system that allows us to coexist together in harmony and preserve the pond beautiful purpose with the right incentive. Long-term is the right approach, the most resilient one). Thanks for the convo man, I'm really re-considering my stance here. Again, I think I got my emotions got the best of me initially and cloud my judgment

2) If we can really just try it and "roll it back withouth consequences" if this creates more harm than good by all means, let's experiment to see what works best. But I guess if this change turns out badly, the only way to really roll it back is through consensus change? Am i right in saying this?
1
Toad · 58w
No worries, I also like the points you make, makes me rethink my opinion as well and also sharpens the image for myself when thinking about it. 2) I think it's not a hardfork, it will be along the lines "we accept the bigger OP_RETURNS until block 888888, but blocks following after that, will be re...