THERE’S A DIGITAL ASSET IT’S CALLED BITCOIN RIGHT. WHAT’S THE SECOND BEST DIGITAL ASSET?

Gigachad genius at work. If you understand what money is and then what ₿itcoin is. You have a chance at understanding what MSTR is. Are there risks? Yes. Is it a honey pot? Yes. Is self-custody cold storage ₿itcoin best? Yes. But all ₿itcoiners should be cheering this speculative attack on. ...

Of course he owns Michael(.) Com lmao

Seems stuffed with shitcoinary.

🥱

THE SUITS WANT ICO SEASON 2. Plus a whole lot of BS and midwittery

With the below statement, he is excluding Bitcoin from being categorised as a currency? Although I hold Bitcoin from long term store of value and wealth creation, I also believe it should be able to be used as a currency without the fear of implicating a tax event. “Digital Currency – An asset...

I don’t understand why they make all this intelligent stuff public like that. Like Trump and others talking about the strategic reserve and all. Seems you would want some secrets for when you take office. But in Saylors case it lets other countries know what to do as well. But maybe that’s my sm...

It doesn't define Bitcoin backed tokens. Aka #ecash

Bitcoin not mentioned once in short 3 page doc Props up fiat system in digital world, USA remaining largest slave driver. Corps & govt will love this Plebs will hate this If done, USA will be central bank for "One World Order" -high probability We'll wait and see if other countries accept th...

I guess it provides structure which could unlock value in a positive way.

clear and concise what's missing is digital assets owners rights to security, meaning certain privacy guarantees for individuals but maybe that's meant to play out on the local level

I think if US buys #bitcoin, it’s game over for fiat. Other nations aren’t that stupid to still buy their treasury and accept their shitcoin.

The guy is stuck in a traditional finance mindset, such frameworks are for suits.

It says what we have always known. Saylor is a fed pursuing US interests.

Clown show gonna continue

2nd wave of the tokenize everything crowd from defi summer 2020-2022ish Knee jerk reaction is that it's more shutcoins, could be, we'll see Opens more funding opportunities (researchLabCoin, beachFrontProptertyDAO) and 24/7 trading Overall seems like it will expand what you can do with capital ...

https://m.primal.net/NCmU.jpg

This will clean up the space. Let freedom ring and let competition be the winner.

I think the bigger takeaway here is that he owns michael dot com 👀

Ask yourself this question- What is the most energy efficient path to sats as the unit of account? The funnel is USD. He is obviously playing to ruling class. Fiat will continue to be debased and bitcoin is the new asset for new fiat money creation. Stablecoins are a weapons platform. Nobody wants t...

Not an American, but I like it and I hope it get`s implemented

Shit coins #1 #2 and #3 fall into which bucket?

Just stopped when it says "Digital Token" 😂

Credit: nostr:nprofile1qqswrlyglr3hs7z9slprxl6why9ydsxqvgky9emawhky5d6jruc0vgspzfmhxue69uhhqatjwpkx2urpvuhx2ucpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cspz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43qw43jye https://image.nostr.build/9d8d0c591b2039caa9761cec09bb8700f62e1d0572f513fcee6aa6dd1b98833d.jpg

It's consistent with what he has be saying do a long time now "BITCOIN IS PROPERTY" like a house in Manhatten. The paper is a lot of words for lawyers. I'll continue to use bitcoin how I want to use it, Michael can do the same.

Long term we collapse into BTC collateral and $USD stablecoin. Why do we need AUD, CAD, YEN, EURO etc?So the rent seeking middle men can clip every ticket? I think not.

Nice!

Stay humble stack sats

i interpret most of the word salad that’s coming out of saylor’s mouth lately as a strategy to downplay the threat bitcoin poses to the dollar i think he knows how powerful bitcoin is and he tries to buy more time for the virus to spread that’s the only explanation that makes sense

Most probable outcome- 1. Digital securities ✅ 2. Digital Dollar ✅ 3. Bitcoin Reserves ✅

I was impressed that he owned michael(dot)com

Most here probably want there to only be bitcoin. But of course that’s not the case - there are a lot of other things. Governments can either: 1) ban those things, 2) ignore them, 3) define them and figure out how they fit into our existing world. Not a fan of government bans. They’ve been i...

There is an element of a “digital bill of rights” to it.

I like it.

Saylor the seductress. Reading Saylor's BSci thesis is helpful to understand what he is doing, and why. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1XkXUBIDVAlKLES_Hm28fP2NfkcXKBDQc/view

Since he doesn't own any Bitcoin, he should start.

Looks like there is a ton of work to be done to implement this framework. Although, I’m not interested in any fiat based digital currency, I do see the need for defining rights, and responsibilities for these new (asset?) classes. This is a good open letter to governments that there are opportuni...