✙ dcc :pedomustdie: :phear_slackware:
· 34w
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqmatts0af7dpal35q39sqmqfz4tt9jrz0h74alzyh0yj6x9tprucs5aqk9e nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqy80vm0yvp64cx6e8y0eetu4mhwt5muz...
What's the point, either he's got the spirit to show him the truth of the matter or he doesn't, and if he does, it's his choice to listen to him or not.
But I was thinking about it earlier:
Bible English is self defining and it's written that way on purpose, like making a new programming language with special features like you know, being able to define variables. It's poetic and precise, and because of the way it's written, again, resists linguistic changes that make the meanings of words malleable and therefore meaningless.
KJV tells you what God said, others tell you what the translators think he meant.
If he want to read the nasb or niv or whatever and substitute the holy ghost with a bible scholar - he's the one who will have to suffer the consequences and that's his choice.