The Protocols...
From wikipedia - "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion[b][c] is an antisemitic hoax and forgery[1] purporting to detail a Jewish plot for global domination."
A hoax and a forgery. Hmmmmm. Well, in that notes were taken at a roundtable of Jewish overlords and then translated into a dialogue I suppose it is true that the Protocols are a hoax. That it is plagiarized and misattributed would indeed qualify it as a forgery.
But that entirely misses the point. One might as well call The Republic a hoax and a forgery. The writing is not a transcript of an actual dialogue by Socrates, nor was Socrates the author of the work. But the ideas contained therein are philosophical truths that anyone can recognize.
So it is with the Protocols. The writing is not a verbatim transcript of a supreme Jewish world council. But it is absolutely true that it is an exemplary and honest appraisal of the tactics and goals of Jews worldwide, particularly "Zionists." Just as it doesn't matter if Socrates actually said the words Plato wrote down, it doesn't matter if Jews wrote the Protocols or if they were simply an accurate description of the world Jewish problem.
It is a supremely Jewish tactic to argue over authorship and authenticity of a work, and not to address the actual subject, which is clear to anyone as 100% true reflection of reality. Wikipedia can call the Protocols a forgery and a hoax, but they can't call it false.
From wikipedia - "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion[b][c] is an antisemitic hoax and forgery[1] purporting to detail a Jewish plot for global domination."
A hoax and a forgery. Hmmmmm. Well, in that notes were taken at a roundtable of Jewish overlords and then translated into a dialogue I suppose it is true that the Protocols are a hoax. That it is plagiarized and misattributed would indeed qualify it as a forgery.
But that entirely misses the point. One might as well call The Republic a hoax and a forgery. The writing is not a transcript of an actual dialogue by Socrates, nor was Socrates the author of the work. But the ideas contained therein are philosophical truths that anyone can recognize.
So it is with the Protocols. The writing is not a verbatim transcript of a supreme Jewish world council. But it is absolutely true that it is an exemplary and honest appraisal of the tactics and goals of Jews worldwide, particularly "Zionists." Just as it doesn't matter if Socrates actually said the words Plato wrote down, it doesn't matter if Jews wrote the Protocols or if they were simply an accurate description of the world Jewish problem.
It is a supremely Jewish tactic to argue over authorship and authenticity of a work, and not to address the actual subject, which is clear to anyone as 100% true reflection of reality. Wikipedia can call the Protocols a forgery and a hoax, but they can't call it false.
2
