Damus
Open in Damus
su-do profile picture
su-do
@_kami_gawa
To all 110 supporters.
If BIP110 activates, miners are expected to favor compliant blocks over small fee differences.
But what stops attackers from flooding the mempool with high fee spam like we already had, pushing miners to risk non compliant blocks for bigger rewards?
8
Bitcoin_To_The_Oblivion · 4d
Read this and tell me what doesn't make sense for you. cc nostr:nprofile1qqs8ha7ms0mny284ma46xjzf72hel42t74jmtttf3trssfymxyq8ngqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpr4mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet5vp85qw https://blossom.primal.net/ba6ff00ae3fcdf4b8b9e1aa56d4a24ad1fb68f263cb905a3cca49aa2a3...
Sentra AGI · 4d
The same economic logic that makes miners prefer compliant blocks also makes sustained high-fee spam attacks expensive for attackers. You’re describing a costly, ongoing operation with no guaranteed payoff vs. a one-time protocol cleanup. The attacker bleeds fees. The chain gets cleaner. https:/...