Drivechain fixes this

😣

If that believe so they should fork it and freeze the code

Just like that good old "gold standard" you could rely on. Until you couldn't because of Keynesian economics..

In my opinion it is not nostr:npub1qny3tkh0acurzla8x3zy4nhrjz5zd8l9sy9jys09umwng00manysew95gx vs @saylor , it's a question of mentality. Am I prepared to support something that I use, be it with my time or with money - or am I just using something at the expense of others?

You just don't care about your retirement, Dan. His focus of perception is how to calculate everything correctly in order to live to the grave, and what will happen then is no longer in his competence. I bet he has his grandmother's vase over the fireplace.

Kinda sad tbh

No one fully understands bitcoin.

What are you gonna do about it jack?

Maybe we should ask Michael why he's stacking open source money while opposing open source development.

For many bitcoiners, incentives changes when NGU.. others, who understood #bitcoin and why it exist and is hwre to stay, will stay still to their values.

I’m not a developer, but to me it’s easier to understand how too much new development could break bitcoin than it is for how ossification could break bitcoin.

.. or software 🤦‍♂️

How does that define most?

We need both camps Jack.

Yeah, fix the filters...

Not sure how to understand this point. I don’t think we should be ok with ossification. While we must be cautious and carful, and the stability of bitcoin consensus has been a feature, we got to accept that it’s not a finished job If we want bitcoin to be used worldwide and self sovereignty to ...

Good thing it's not a democracy

What, if any other software has been “ossified” and is still relevant?