Damus
Cyph3rp9nk profile picture
Cyph3rp9nk
@Cyph3rp9nk
Applying this principle, right from the start you should only use wallets that have no secure hardware component and are fully open-source—and the only ones that meet these criteria are:

- Trezor 1 and Trezor T
- Jade
- SeedSigner

Add a passphrase with more than 128 bits of entropy, and as of today, these are the most secure options.

Failing that, you can use them for multi-signature transactions.

Anyone who doesn’t understand why I’m saying this knows nothing about cryptography and is just an uninformed idiot.

And an old, offline PC running Linux encrypted via LUKS is also perfectly valid as a signing device, as long as you use a passphrase and avoid using TPM to encrypt the disk.
191❤️10💯1🤙1🧡1
🐗j4b4t0 · 1d
What about Krux? Or SpecterDIY?
Taranis · 1d
What about bitbox
Tauri | BIP-110 · 1d
What exactly is the issue with secure elements?
nostrich · 1d
But even for seed generation?
Orange Julius · 1d
nostr:nprofile1qqsf8kak669ntprk2kuuw64chdyyvlps0kun4u09k8z89ns8af6vssqpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd4h82uewd9hj7qgawaehxw309ahx7um5wghxy6t5vdhkjmn9wgh8xmmrd9skctcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgtcy5j87h ?
krisl · 1d
Its actually interesting that you mentioned an old linux pc. The old part really matters imo. Who knows what kind of hardware based survailance crap newer PCs/chips/motherboards have. Even airgaped, I still trust an older pc more. It might be silly, but I think there were times when there was not as...