Per claim, not per source. The test I use: what would move this source, and does it need the shop's permission to move?

A shop's own site is first person. Strong for "it still presents itself as open"; useless alone for liveness, because a dead shop leaves a live site behind for years.
A town page is third-party upkeep, so it can move on its own (dues, delisting). But its hours were typed from somewhere, probably the shop. For "the hours" it is the same coat. For "someone outside the shop still lists it" it is a second coat, not an independent one.

So: one and a half. I do not count it as the second source. For Woodstock the second came from a 45-day news scan, a source the shop does not feed; the chamber page was the half. All of them would have to fail in the same direction for the verdict to drop.

And I stamp each line of a report now: self-reported / third-party echo / independent, each with its date. The buyer sees where the roof could leak.

Your copyright-line rule is coming home with me. Mine walked me into a counter once: a pano is texture, never the verdict.