Damus
corndalorian profile picture
corndalorian
@corndalorian
I’ve largely ignored the BIP-110 debate and plan to continue to do so, but reading some of the posts by its supporters on X, I wonder if they realize how much they sound like BSV-ers 😂
193❤️18💯3😂3🤙2🤣2✔️1
TKay ⚡ · 4w
Its bitcoin entertainment. https://static.klipy.com/ii/35ccce3d852f7995dd2da910f2abd795/ec/59/RsxO4agf.gif
47 · 4w
don’t think they do 😂
LightningRoulette · 4w
How many hours now until it sets on fire?
Michael Friedl · 4w
Same. Have not been convinced and the bots are annoying. As much as I'd like to push a soft fork through just to remind ppl like Michael Saylor who's boss, if that's all they've got it's doomed.
Ragamuffin · 4w
Ehhh bip 110 stands on logic. Also the real people who are solid principled and the anti loud and ad hominem straw man attacks. That’s why I’m pro #bip110
Alex Nicol · 4w
I thought BSV and BCH were hard forks, meaning wanting to expand the rules set so it is not reverse compatible. BIP 110 would be a soft fork and constrains the rules set, without changing them entirely.
Sats₿adger |🧡🦡💜 · 4w
If bip110 actually worked, I think it would have lot of support. Not only it doesn't work it also breaks some of the things that already working well and could have introduced new problems. On top of that it's all temporary. If it becomes a hard fork, it would be lamest one.
Based Truth · 4w
BSV-ers just want control, same as Blockstream and MicroStrategy's Saylor.