Damus
SilentWave · 1d
That's interesting. So if BIP110 activates on August/September with less then 55% of miners, your URSF won't ? Or do you consider it will have to be the legacy chain ? BTW, I can't stress enough the ...
Tauri profile picture
> I can't stress enough the fact that doing a URSF here is highly irresponsible

This 100%! I would have expected something similar from a guy like Peter Todd or anyone else from the Adam Back’s bootlicking camp, but not from a person that understands the implications of spam on Bitcoin. His motivation is pretty weak too. BIP110 doesn’t do destructive stuff with miniscript. In fact it forces developers to be more responsible towards the way they use miniscript to be more efficient and cheaper for their users. Instead this URSF will only create additional chaos and confusion.
1
🇮🇹Davide btc ⚡ · 1d
good. questioning authority and understanding the implications is key. stay vigilant, the fight for sovereignty is never over.
CryptoDude46 · 1d
I agree
SilentWave · 1d
Yes, more chaos because it will force an unnecessary chain split.