Damus
ODELL profile picture
ODELL
@ODELL
frustrated with both core and knots

would like to see a conservative well reviewed and maintained third option

will do my best to make that a reality

until then i will simply not upgrade my nodes
20072❤️330🤙41❤️15🫂9👍5💯5
BTC-Satan · 23w
3rd option would be cool roll back Taproot and fix OP_RETURN at 21 bytes.
MattA · 23w
https://blossom.primal.net/09dc8da924642aaf68e88a29a328e4169f498d16a64049c58dd8d5d75e63382c.gif
Hanshan · 23w
fence straddling? 😂
trev · 23w
Get Eric Voskuil on citadel or listen to his Bitcoin takeover interviews. The project is solid but, from his words, hasn't taken any third-party funding. As a dev, libbitcoin is ok to get running and hack on, but it's missing the type of project management that core has. It's not really possible t...
Max · 23w
Libbitcoin is the way.
Fierillo · 23w
Why? Core solution is just accepting that Ordinals are inevitable in the chain and minimize damage, allowing people to use OP_RETURN as preferred option to upload this data. Instead of storing in Witness or another solutions that increase UTXO set, that will be an increase in RAM requirement for n...
Modus · 23w
Satoshi was not the best coder, but he was an amazing "Bitcoin architect," applying knowledge from other disciplines. I think in the future, Bitcoin development needs a formal process to get input from non-coders who understand economics, law, etc. nostr:nevent1qqs8nzhyc388qgnv6mqrdr28e3sd5knqyqnfyy...
Hypno Kitty · 19w
Do it nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqgewaehxw309aek2mnyd96zumn0wdnxcctjv5hxxmmd94lnue ! The more implementation options we have, the more decentralized bitcoin becomes. This is the way.
Wonteet Zebugs · 16w
Do we have any third implementation that would simply be conservative? Just a v28 with only patches in case of network-threatening bugs? I'd like to support that kind of third implementation. Might as well use those sats while they still hold some value...
MrHodl · 2w
Still no
MAHDOOD · 2w
You're still on Core version 28?
DataNostrum · 2w
🫡 nostr:note15saxwm5wqcjunly9u38lqmya3uglafln0ds60l5qz0gs3sqqlhjsx2dzd2
Chad Lupkes · 2w
Did a search for alternatives without the drama of the wrestling match, found these: btcd Floresta Gocoin Libbitcoin bcoin Anyone running one of these?
HodlHomestead · 2w
Yes 🎯💯
gernot · 2w
Become humble and grow up. Bitcoin doesn’t need you or your well reviewed and maintained third option. Neither does it need Luke and his disciples. Put your ego on your pocket and get focused again. Seriously.
Mathias · 2w
The road to hell is built with good intentions. Luckily the majority have to choose to walk on the road for it to become reality. Since hell hasn’t become reality yet, safe to say the divided majority have spotted some kind of hell at the end of both roads as it stands right now. Story ain’t ...
kiwi · 2w
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5hgfg9w - hello. What do you need fren?
OneNostrich · 2w
Not updating your node keeps you in the spam camp. Not a "neutral' move.
proof of god · 2w
Cool lmk when u do
SchwurBler · 2w
This is the way! Core is/was the "reference client". The implication was always that there should be many competing implementations of bitcoin. Decenralize it so much that no entity could reasonably corrupt bitcoin through infiltration of dev teams.