Damus
โ‚ฟโ˜ปแธถโ† · 110w
If by banning you mean shamming ๐Ÿ˜
utxo the webmaster ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐Ÿ’ป · 110w
No, but 360 dunking on them all day
LibertyImp · 110w
No, they might be stupid and wrong but they are allowed to be stupid and wrong.
Don't Believe The Vibe ๐ŸŒฑ๐Ÿ‹๐ŸŠ · 110w
That's the neat part. You can't. And that's a feature.
GHOST · 110w
And how exactly would we do that? Nostr is for enemies
nemesis · 110w
Not even almost.
Hi, it's Me · 110w
Asking that, means you are one of them
Joe · 110w
Can you ban anything at all from Nostr? Thought the was the whole point...
Sergio · 110w
When you cross that threshold you become the very aggressor you fought against.
๐Ÿ‡ฐโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ทโ€Š๐Ÿ‡พโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ตโ€Š๐Ÿ‡นโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ฝ · 110w
banning socialists and communists could be seen as extreme and counterproductive. A balanced approach that enforces rules consistently while respecting free speech might be more effective.
kidwarp · 110w
Good luck trying lmfao
๐š๐šข๐šŠ๐š— ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ๐ŸŽถ · 110w
https://www.memecreator.org/static/images/memes/5554467.jpg
JT · 110w
What a dumb question. Everybody has a voice, especially the oppressed.
MeredithAnne · 110w
Have you tried calling Nostr support? Reaching out to the head of content moderation? Possibly HR? nostr:npub1hte85nxymfyez0nlmmxf287nh9cujfuetxhk9vptwcdqg0pn8pxqxasw3d nostr:npub1xtscya34g58tk0z605fvr788k263gsu6cy9x0mhnm87echrgufzsevkk5s
unknown · 110w
Nostr is for everyone even people we hate. Speech must be free even if and especially when we disagree ๐Ÿ‘€
Rich Nost · 110w
What fun is that? I'd rather they be bullied off the platform, as God intended.
๐Ÿ‡ฐโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ทโ€Š๐Ÿ‡พโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ตโ€Š๐Ÿ‡นโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ฎโ€Š๐Ÿ‡ฝ · 110w
๐Ÿคก
Hodl Harry · 110w
As soon as we start banning, we're taking away freedom..
RalfWausE · 110w
The moment you start to ban people with opposing ideas (how stupid those ideas ever may be from your perspective) you saw the seed of oppression that will at some point used against you... this has been proven time after time in human history
mleku · 110w
nostr is leaky... the events are the media
JamPower · 110w
Why? In diversity we find challenges and in challenge opportunities.
Juraj๐Ÿด๐Ÿ’›๐ŸŒ˜ · 110w
No, but relays where statists are banned or discovery mechanism for non-statists I would appreciate. Or maybe badge-rating mechanism. You can't ban people, that's not how Nostr works. Mastodon works that way though, through the power of network effect of the servers, it was (last time I checked) ve...
TheGrinder · 110w
That's like saying banning people from using Bitcoin. Is not how this works.
Dr. The Daniel ๐Ÿ–– · 110w
https://image.nostr.build/43c8370c6af4c19d28832a9e4101c59ab37d4ce53858aacd3a5eefcf397d6ff2.gif
Account deleted · 110w
It defies the purpose of having a social media that puts freedom of speech on a pedestal, no?
TriniBTC · 110w
Think ideas should be fought with ideas. Discussions and debates should always be encouraged.
rado1 · 110w
Why? Just don't follow them. Easy.
nobody · 110w
No
Mark Camper · 110w
No, but I do like to automatically suppress reach of the scammers and spammers. WoT should help keep it decentralized.
binmucker · 110w
No I would rather mock their poor ideas and use words to convince them nothing is free and their policies lead to death, destruction, and basically the opposite of everything they promise. IRL is a different story, but in cyber space it's much harder to violate one's private property so I don't thin...