Damus
Guy Swann profile picture
Guy Swann
@TheGuySwann
Might just be my perspective and familiarity... but I kinda feel like every self custody setup should now be multisig, AND that multisig is how we should think about key recovery (rather than a bunch of paper seeds) and "backups" for the user. 🧐

Thoughts...?
51❀️6πŸ€™4πŸ’―2βœ…1πŸ’œ1🦴1
Reed · 81w
I'm also waiting for lightning implementations that close channels to offline keys (single or multi sig). I'd feel a lot more comfortable holding more in lightning channels if I knew my sats ultimately would land in cold storage.
Den Yellek · 81w
If you can spend you bitcoin without leaving your house, flying to at least three continents, traversing the ocean in a submarine and using a time machine then your bitcoin is not safe. I don't know how you all sleep at night.
ski · 81w
Like bitkey? https://bitkey.build/seed-phrases-are-sharp-edges/
AU9913 · 81w
Fees, you're increasing fees on all transactions going forward to spend.
replete sumo · 81w
For generational cold storage, how do you argue against a 24 word seedplate stored in a block of concrete?
pup · 81w
The only reason I don't agree, is because I think a distributed multisig setup is a lot to ask of someone who just bought their first 100k sats. Like anything in Bitcoin, security should be a journey that grows as your gain conviction. This isn't to say that I didn't set up a distributed multisig ...
utxo the webmaster πŸ§‘β€πŸ’» · 81w
Multisig is the way imo once you are sufficiently advanced, single points of failure are not ideal It makes it safer to make backups in traditionally "less secure" methods (ie encrypted cloud backups) because even if someone does find one key, you're still safe
FΓ€bu · 81w
There are also a lot pitfalls in multisig which you have to consider. There is probably not one goto solution.
Muzan · 81w
Couldn't agree more
Nich · 81w
> Multisig is how we should think about key recovery… Could you expand on this point a bit?
Hamlin · 81w
Do holders want to move their 'secure enough' stacks though? πŸ€”
mikez · 81w
Strong agree but need FROST for privacy preservation and to swap keys in/out.
Cavedogg · 81w
Doesn’t mutlisig in some ways add counterparty risk which I’m trying to get away from in the fiat world?
Judge Hardcase · 81w
Generally, I still subscribe to the Sparrow Wallet best practices. Though, I'm not married to the amount thresholds. In short, I still think a paper seed for a singlesig wallet can be perfectly appropriate depending on the situation. https://image.nostr.build/fe0e229d1cd014578bbfe732af086d60b7b60...
MickBurke · 81w
Yes.
Jim · 81w
Serious question, does the best most secure wallet and single or multi-sig really matter? If I'm coming after your Bitcoin I'm coming for your seed phrase not your wallet. If I have your words nothing else matters right?
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) · 81w
No. Unless you are securing more than 100 bitcoin, A 12 or 24 word passphrased cold card should suffice
Rand · 81w
mixed/pros & cons
One of us · 80w
Bitcoin's L1 architecture makes widespread self-custody on the L1 technically infeasible, regardless of setup (single-sig or multi-sig). Self-custodial Lightning wallets have proven inadequate due to their complexity and channel liquidity requirements. Sidechains like Liquid are not a viable solutio...