Everyone is laughing at Prof Jiang for asking where the "blockchain servers" are and floating the CIA Bitcoin theory.
But I'm not laughing. You might be watching a psyop play out in real time.
Jiang is a tenured professor. Are we really supposed to believe he doesn't understand distributed computing?
Does he know what BitTorrent is? When you download a torrent file, nobody asks where the central "torrent server" is. The participants are the network. The nodes are the infrastructure. A credentialed academic pretending not to grasp this is not ignorance. It is a red flag.
This feels like manufactured confusion.
Ask yourself: who wins if the public believes the CIA created Bitcoin?
The fiat system is dying. The money printer is destroying middle class purchasing power. Bitcoin is the mathematically guaranteed escape hatch. The state cannot hack the network. They cannot ban the math. Their only remaining weapon is narrative control.
If they convince the masses that Bitcoin is a government surveillance honeypot, those people stay trapped in melting fiat. Forever. That is the goal.
The Mathematical Reality
Here is the thing: I run a "bitcoin server". And you can too.
The code is open source. The cryptography is transparent. The 21 million hard cap is verifiable by anyone running a node. You don't have to trust Satoshi's identity. You don't have to trust the government. You only have to verify the SHA-256 math.
Don't laugh at the confused professor. Recognize this might all be a performance.
They are trying to scare you away from the exit doors right before the fiat system collapses.
Don't trust the narrative.
106鉂わ笍12鉂わ笍1馃憖1馃敟1馃珎1