Exactly as Mechanic predicted months ago. If these gremlins win the spam war, then nothing stops them from pushing miners to support tail emissions or uncapping the supply of Bitcoin. These are the pe...
Even though I’ve been running Knots and BIP110 for months, I still expect it to fail because 15% of nodes is probably not high enough. I also don’t necessarily think its failure means miners automatically have control. It might simply mean that the node % wasn’t high enough. Ex. Unless I’m missing something obvious, if miners want to cancel the next halving, add tail emissions, etc, then we can expect 99%+ of nodes to reject that.
What if 10% of nodes wanted a UASF? 5%? 1%? What’s the threshold where if it’s rejected, then miners have proven control? It’s subjective and hard to say. You could compare it to BIP148, also around 15%, but two UASF scenarios will never be same.
What if 10% of nodes wanted a UASF? 5%? 1%? What’s the threshold where if it’s rejected, then miners have proven control? It’s subjective and hard to say. You could compare it to BIP148, also around 15%, but two UASF scenarios will never be same.
4❤️1
