Damus
Gigi · 101w
"Open-source devs building non-custodial tools can be held responsible for criminal activity when crim. actors cannot be stopped or deanonymized" https://x.com/L0laL33tz/status/1790385855556698448
Danny profile picture
The world has literally gone crazy. How is that different than saying

"Car manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cars to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified"

"Book publishers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use information from their books to commit crimes and cannot be stopped or identified."

"Camera manufacturers can be held responsible for criminal activity when criminals use their cameras to surveil and plan illegal activities and cannot be stopped or identified."
54❤️6💯6🧡3❤️2🔥2🤙2
Fernando Falci ⚡️ · 101w
Gov should be help responsible for criminal activity when fiat money is involved
Gigi · 101w
Yup. It's pretty crazy. nostr:nevent1qqstd94qfasvjjtcfhr88n5q9llslzsq20pcq3f9ls4jvkj7p2x4kycpz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ezu6twdaehgcfwvd3sygrwg6zz9hahfftnsup23q3mnv5pdz46hpj4l2ktdpfu6rhpthhwjvpsgqqqqqqs9zyxdw
CitizenPleb · 101w
Because it’s different when it affects and hurts THE BANKING CARTEL.
daum3ns · 101w
imagine tcp/ip devs are now responsible for ALL online crimes🤣
humblepardon · 101w
I think the unspoken idea here is that privacy itself is seen as a crime. Cars have legitimate uses, but in their minds you have no right to evade financial surveillance.
Satosha · 101w
Never seen cars being distributed free though :-) or Cameras or even physical books - soft books yes but you cant throw them on anyone to cause a hurt :-) Free porn was always under eyes and is in many jurisdictions - but it got lax now for there are bigger issues of money ..
Dr. Hax · 101w
Please don't tempt the courts and lawmakers to take stances like these, they just might do it, unironically.
Laeserin · 101w
nostr:note1ckj3u9gepvg5avzwtgethd5zda8z6kk73mmzh8pcwgxdvwj0najs0f4nkm