Yes, I imagine this happens to all domain providers. The key would be which one mitigates it the most.
Yeah - hard to find generally (and hard to obtain trusted public knowledge of such actions, not many will put it on display).
But the distinction could be:
1) active pressure from outside (the GOV branches) - not happened here I think
VS
2) proactive measure (in this case suspension of quite harmless domain)
I mean it's understandable for a fake b4nks URL redirect, CSAM, not much restricted FS service and as such.
But coordinator preemptively is just to much kneejerk IMO.
But the distinction could be:
1) active pressure from outside (the GOV branches) - not happened here I think
VS
2) proactive measure (in this case suspension of quite harmless domain)
I mean it's understandable for a fake b4nks URL redirect, CSAM, not much restricted FS service and as such.
But coordinator preemptively is just to much kneejerk IMO.
1