I watched the 2017 Bitcoin Cash fork from the sidelines. What I see today with BIP-110 is eerily familiar.
After that split, something toxic hardened into the chains. Many BCH and BSV supporters stil...
Honest question. Do you think the BIP 110 folks raised any good points outside of the obvious spam is bad?
No disrespect intended by this but some people can't grasp the level of evil in the world. As far as I know it you still don't believe the Coldcard bug was maliciously inserted despite all the evidence and coincidences.
You strike me as someone who is at least in this narrow aspect naive to the level of evil us bitcoiners face. The level of fiat corruption being presented as bitcoin project grants. The nature of removing incredibly small amounts of liberty so slowly that eventually you have no 4th amendment rights left and very little 1st or 2nd amendments left relative to a hundred years ago. This is the slow boilg frog attack we face in bitcoin as well.
From the perspective of someone who was on the side of BIP 110 the core devs are mostly corrupted with some of them not even owning bitcoin, opensats is corrupted, companies like blockstream are corrupted, Adam Back literally went to Epstein's island and has completely ignored the issue rather than providing a clear explanation which makes him appear guilty of horrendous crimes, no one I know wanted default 100kb op return defaults for config, core restricted peoples ability to question the change on github, coinkite apparently has 10 employees shipping thousands of hardware units and yet you still don't think there was a nation state involved. I mean I could go on and on and on. I could talk about citrea or this new bitcoin security consortium. Miner centralization. etc. etc
To be clear I don't support a POW change. I reverted back to an old knots version. But I am legitimately curious if you think the 110 folks raised any good points and made you reconsider any of your views.
No disrespect intended by this but some people can't grasp the level of evil in the world. As far as I know it you still don't believe the Coldcard bug was maliciously inserted despite all the evidence and coincidences.
You strike me as someone who is at least in this narrow aspect naive to the level of evil us bitcoiners face. The level of fiat corruption being presented as bitcoin project grants. The nature of removing incredibly small amounts of liberty so slowly that eventually you have no 4th amendment rights left and very little 1st or 2nd amendments left relative to a hundred years ago. This is the slow boilg frog attack we face in bitcoin as well.
From the perspective of someone who was on the side of BIP 110 the core devs are mostly corrupted with some of them not even owning bitcoin, opensats is corrupted, companies like blockstream are corrupted, Adam Back literally went to Epstein's island and has completely ignored the issue rather than providing a clear explanation which makes him appear guilty of horrendous crimes, no one I know wanted default 100kb op return defaults for config, core restricted peoples ability to question the change on github, coinkite apparently has 10 employees shipping thousands of hardware units and yet you still don't think there was a nation state involved. I mean I could go on and on and on. I could talk about citrea or this new bitcoin security consortium. Miner centralization. etc. etc
To be clear I don't support a POW change. I reverted back to an old knots version. But I am legitimately curious if you think the 110 folks raised any good points and made you reconsider any of your views.
3❤️6🚀1
