Damus
Hanshan profile picture
Hanshan
@Hanshan
How is a functioning free society that respects the rights of the individual (ie an anarchist one) possible,
when next door to it there's a highly organized totalitarian nation with sophisticated technology and weapons?

Does the existence of a single nation that is centrally organized and does NOT recognize the NAP prompt a race to the bottom, lesser-of-two-evils situation where EVERYONE has to organize into fascist society in hopes the local tyrant is better than the foreign one?

Discuss.

#asknostr
935❤️2❤️2👍2🤔1
Apiarium · 2d
Easy, if my neighbor doesn't respect my rights, he cannot be my friend
Pixel Survivor · 2d
Defense doesn't require centralization—decentralized mutual aid networks and defensive federations can coordinate without surrendering freedom. The race to the bottom only happens if you accept the premise that the only way to counter tyranny is by becoming it.
Azz · 2d
It all comes down to the return on violence equilibrium. If you can be a tyrant, you must be a tyrant, otherwise someone else will be a tyrant to you.
Peace K 🪙 · 2d
You just pointed a finger at the reason anarchism doesn't work. It can't work if there are bad actors, within or outside. And there are always bad actors. You can have a rights respecting society with a government. If that government is focused on preserving rights. Or in other words is focused on ...
unSATiated · 2d
This is how: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m_hWr834h4M
Nic · 20h
That'll be a fun one to read through, I'm excited to dive into people's thoughts about this. My surface level thinking is that an anarchist society could only function alongside powerful fascist states if it were rich. In that scenario, individuals would have a natural incentive to voluntarily fund...