I will try to explain my position regarding the Epstein documents.
Some that are not related to Bitcoin I include as a curiosity; I find them very interesting, for example, all those related to the Rothschild family, because it is a subject I follow closely due to a close friend of mine who introduced me to that rabbit hole years ago.
The ones that are important to me are those related to Bitcoin, which are indeed having the desired effect on the masses that I mentioned yesterday in my first note before posting the documents. People will misinterpret them and say things like Bitcoin was created by the CIA and other nonsense like that. This is already happening, and it is surely what they were looking for, at least as far as the attack on Bitcoin is concerned, because as I said, the attack is multifocal.
But you have to know how to read this. For example, the document that was shown yesterday about Adam Back has served to get Adam Back to admit that Blockstream received funding from Epstein, so obviously there are things that are true. Until now, Blockstream has remained very quiet about this. Why? It's also curious that it was in 2014, and in 2014 it was already known that Epstein was a pedophile and was being prosecuted. I suppose you understand the seriousness of the matter.
Are we ignoring all this? Obviously, there are many connections and suspicions that have come true, and we don't even know 1% of all this shit.
You know that I have been arguing for years that intelligence agencies have infiltrated Bitcoin. The Epstein documents and the revelations they will provoke in some of those involved only confirm my theory. In light of this, I cannot remain indifferent.
As I have been saying, we need more Bitcoin client implementations, or we will always be stuck with this shit and without real consensus.
Some that are not related to Bitcoin I include as a curiosity; I find them very interesting, for example, all those related to the Rothschild family, because it is a subject I follow closely due to a close friend of mine who introduced me to that rabbit hole years ago.
The ones that are important to me are those related to Bitcoin, which are indeed having the desired effect on the masses that I mentioned yesterday in my first note before posting the documents. People will misinterpret them and say things like Bitcoin was created by the CIA and other nonsense like that. This is already happening, and it is surely what they were looking for, at least as far as the attack on Bitcoin is concerned, because as I said, the attack is multifocal.
But you have to know how to read this. For example, the document that was shown yesterday about Adam Back has served to get Adam Back to admit that Blockstream received funding from Epstein, so obviously there are things that are true. Until now, Blockstream has remained very quiet about this. Why? It's also curious that it was in 2014, and in 2014 it was already known that Epstein was a pedophile and was being prosecuted. I suppose you understand the seriousness of the matter.
Are we ignoring all this? Obviously, there are many connections and suspicions that have come true, and we don't even know 1% of all this shit.
You know that I have been arguing for years that intelligence agencies have infiltrated Bitcoin. The Epstein documents and the revelations they will provoke in some of those involved only confirm my theory. In light of this, I cannot remain indifferent.
As I have been saying, we need more Bitcoin client implementations, or we will always be stuck with this shit and without real consensus.
12
